Thursday 12 January 2017

Mirror Mirror on the Wall, who’s the fairest of them all?



My King, you are the fairest here so true…









By Neo Pachisia



Yeh Jabr Bhi Dekha Hai, Taareekh ki Nazron Ne
Lamho ne Khata ki thi, Sadiyon Ne Sazaa Paayee

(Literally & poorly translated, this beautiful couplet above means: 
The eyes of history, have even witnessed this compulsion 
A momentary lapse, has led to centuries of punishment).







In the 2014 general elections, like millions of others, many of my hardcore Congressi family members felt sheepish but opted for Modi. And now I understand why.

Manmohan Singh’s vapid leadership, inability to prevent scams, had left many of us feeling frustrated and disempowered. So Modi who arrived on the scene as a testosterone-bleeding man’s man seemed the one who would restore our sense of potency, not to mention erase the endemic corruption, rebuild and transform India into a glorious new version of itself.

Whether it is in nations, street gangs, mafia families, politics or corporations, if the leader is missing or weak, the vacuum provides a  perfect opportunity for narcissists to take over.  Narcissists can be very attractive to others, at least in the beginning as they go on a charm offensive in order to make the future ‘narcissistic supplier’ feel really special and attended to. Once bonded, the victim would have a hard time escaping or breaking off from the Narc.


Narcissism is a term expressing self love. There is healthy and reparative narcissism, which ideally we should all possess—which helps us feel self confident, have a realistic assessment of our talents or lack thereof, have ambitions and goals and we can pursue them with the belief that we deserve to have what we desire. 

Self confidence with commensurate abilities and self belief lead to success.

Nehru may have been a reparative narcissist who had a vision of a fairer, more just and free India and and he pursued that vision dragging India, as some believe, single-handedly into the 21st century. Arvind Kejriwal, Chief Minister of New Delhi, may be similar in some ways. Reparative Narcissists define their mission to be in alignment with the needs of their followers.

Then there is unhealthy narcissism which varies by degrees, such as Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) and its most extreme form Malignant Narcissism (MN).

“A simple narcissist is someone who is self-absorbed,” says Peter Freed, a psychiatrist at the Personality Studies Institute in New York City. “On the other hand, people with narcissistic personality disorder are so self-absorbed that they are indifferent, even oblivious, to how they appear to others.”


Some of the obvious and typical characteristics of those with NPD or Malignant Narcissism are: 


1. They are Utterly deficient in empathy & compassion, in the case of MN, they are outright sadistic and cruel. They have No conscience or “Super-ego lacunae” (Holes in conscience)


In July 2016 a video, initially seen with disbelief, eventually went viral generating universal revulsion. Seven  dalit men, in the video, were seen being flogged by 42 vigilante ‘gau rakshaks’ (cow protectors) in Gujarat. This flogging apparently went on for hours, half the time in front of the local police station. The ‘crime’ of these dalit men was to skin a dead cow—a vocation and tradition they have been following for centuries.

Prime Minister Modi’s reaction for the first few weeks was a confounding silence. Finally, an unprecedented backlash by the Dalit community led him to speak out some weeks later with a bizarre remark which was met with widespread derision. “If you have to attack, attack me but stop attacking ‘my dalit bretheren. If you have to shoot, shoot me but not my dalit brothers,” he said.

He expressed No sorrow, no remorse, no shock. A normal, by any standard, response by a head of a country would be to put an immediate end to the attacks, pacify and compensate the victims, arrest the guilty. Modi did none of this. 

Before that, in 2015 a Muslim man named Akhlaq was lynched and killed for the suspicion of having killed a cow and consumed it’s meat. (which was later proven to be false). Again there was a lack of response from Modi, no real action taken against the guilty, in fact in an unbelievable travesty, an enquiry was launched against the widow and family.

In 2002, in an incident often known as the Gujarat riots, over 1000 mostly Muslim men, women and children were killed, mutilated and burned alive by Hindu mobs with Isis-ian savagery, the likes of which India hasn’t seen in years.

Modi was then the Chief Minister and claimed he wasn’t aware of what was going on and did the best he could to stop the killings. Years later, he got a ‘clean chit’ by a Gujarat Police dominated SIT and was absolved of all wrong doing. He was not held guilty of even gross incompetence leave alone for the suspicion of having been in the know and supported the killings. 

Modi has taken virtually no responsibility for it and NOT astonishingly shown no remorse, guilt or even empathy for what happened during that slaughter. When asked in an interview with Reuters whether he regretted the violence, Modi compared his feelings to the occupant of a car involved in an accident.

He said, if "someone else is driving a car and we're sitting behind, even then if a puppy comes under the wheel, will it be painful or not? Of course it is. If I'm a chief minister or not, I'm a human being. If something bad happens anywhere, it is natural to be sad.”


2. Narcissists can be intelligent, extremely manipulative, vengeful, paranoid and envious.

In the summer of 2002, a few months after the Gujarat pogrom, Ashis Nandy, a renowned clinical psychologist and one of India’s best-known public intellectuals, wrote an essay, which earned him a lawsuit from Modi.

In the essay Nandy referred to Modi as a ‘fascist’ not as an insult but as a psychological and clinical description of his personality. Nandy wrote, “….Modi, it gives me no pleasure to tell the readers, met virtually all the criteria that psychiatrists, psycho-analysts and psychologists had set up after years of empirical work on the authoritarian personality. He had the same mix of puritanical rigidity, narrowing of emotional life, massive use of the ego defence of projection, denial and fear of his own passions combined with fantasies of violence – all set within the matrix of clear paranoid and obsessive personality traits.”

———-
Modi, one of six children, grew up in an impoverished family of oil-pressers and as a young boy he helped his father sell tea at the Vadnagar train station to supplement the family income.

With little education, or prospects of success, power or riches little Modi at age 8, was ripe for an organisation like the rightwing RSS which often find their membership base amongst such discontent.

Modi was not only intelligent but had a fierce survival instinct as was evident from his progress in the RSS, an organisation whose head, M.S Golwalkar, was an unabashed admirer of Adolf Hitler and his “purging the country of the Semitic Races—the Jews,” and urged Hindus to manifest a similar “Race Spirit” with Muslims. 

Malignant Narcissists are known to easily adopt and internalise ideologies that are aligned with notions of being superior to others.  

At an early age Modi was also married to a young girl Jasoda, whom he soon abandoned. The woman grew up never properly married, widowed or divorced.

Narendra Modi’s rise to power and success in the RSS and later in it’s political wing the BJP, his transition from CM to PM, is a testimony to his irrefutable powers of manipulation, determination and ability to out-manoeuvre even seasoned, veteran politicians like Lal Krishan Advani and A.B Vajpayee.

Wrote Vinod K Jose in 2012 in The Caravan Magazine, there were “three prominent leaders in the Gujarat BJP—all of them with impeccable Sangh credentials—who spoke out against Modi’s autocratic style within the party. 

“The first, Haren Pandya, who had served as Modi’s revenue minister, was murdered in mysterious circumstances in 2003. The second, Sanjay Joshi, who had become a general secretary in the national BJP, was forced to resign when a CD containing pictures of him with naked women—later determined to be fake—was anonymously circulated to top BJP leaders. And Zadaphia, the third, was pushed out of the cabinet by the end of 2002, and subsequently ejected from the party.

“Modi understands only one alphabet, and that is capital I,” Zadaphia told Jose. “I was threatened with death by Modi himself.”


3. The most obvious characteristic of all those with NPD or Malignant Narcissism is they have an inviolable sense of being entitled the best of everything, of grandiosity. Any kind of adoration inflates and gels with their own sense of self-importance, and those in the public eye love public meetings, the pleasure at being centre of attention thrills them to the core, like a drug high and without another fix soon, they start deflating.

Politics and corporate situations are perfect avenue for their manipulative skills and they thrive well in Machiavellian skullduggery.

According to Plato and Aristotle  “the tyrant is one who..undertakes measures to sow discord among subjects, impoverishes people with his exploits, and uses informers and betrayers to undermine trust among his subjects.”

——-

Soon after CM Modi became PM Modi, people watched initially with indulgence and then stupefaction as the caterpillar transformed into a butterfly. Or what was Modi’s extreme infatuation with himself becoming visible to the world.

I doubt if there are many who support or approve of a bedraggled leader as he is not just representing himself, he is representing the country. So people took pride in how elegant Indira Gandhi looked in silk sarees and coiffed hair, how regal as she met world leaders and held her own.

So Indians were not entirely displeased as Modi dropped the cotton kurta for designer togs. It seemed challenging but they still accepted that he had to apparently change his outfits thrice or more times a day—and never repeat them. But what proved to snap the tolerance of most middle class Indians was the $16,000 suit Modi wore during Obama’s visit, which was monogrammed with Modi’s full name in gold thread. (pic above).

Social media was also incessantly chattering about Modi’s obsession with selfies, whether alone or with other world leaders.

But Nowhere has Modi’s narcissism been more embarrassing for the nation than in his insistence on a forced familiarity via awkward full-body-contact hugs and interlaced fingered hand-holding with world leaders.

Narcissists without exception, are delighted in the proximity of the rich and famous and love to display a familiarity with them, which is all publicised as a reflection of their own elevated status.

In another instance, Prime Minister Modi spent an hour being photographed by a Time magazine photographer who said he normally got only 10 minutes from other country heads.


A person with a healthy sense of self can assess his own strengths and weakness and to a large extent accept and integrate both aspects. A Malignant Narcissist can Never see his own flaws and in a process called splitting, projects the bad, negative traits onto Others. This helps him maintain a self image of being absolutely Perfect.

So anyone who challenges their perfection, who questions their ability, is an immediate and unqualified enemy! 

In an article in Psychology Today psychoanalyst & faculty at Columbia College, NYC, Dr Carrie Barron says, “The combination of subtle paranoia, lack of conscience and sadism in Malignant Narcissists renders these individuals scary, dangerous, and ruthless.  Because they have not internalised the capacity for restraint, revenge for imagined assaults can be cruel, excessive and unfathomable. Their wish to humiliate and destroy can be extreme.” 

So when Delhi’s Chief Minister and Modi’s arch enemy Arvind Kejriwal (AK) stated he thought Modi might have him killed, it was not hyperbole. Or when AK, perhaps intuitively, described Modi as a “psychopath and a coward”, he was scathingly accurate and also unknowingly exposed Modi’s core.
It was like pulling out the pin from a live grenade!


Ex-Congress MP Mani Shankar Aiyar recently wrote in the NDTV opinion page, a blistering and impressive analysis of Modi as if he too is well versed on Malignant Narcs. 

Aiyar wrote:  “Character is destiny. What is happening is happening because Modi is who he is: vain, arrogant, self-obsessed, domineering. He wants to be the only one on the stage, the only one on whom the limelight is playing, the sole recipient of all applause. So he insulates himself from advice, fiercely concentrates decision-making in himself, personalizes governance, and projects only himself. It is therefore only he, not even the hapless Jaitley who seems to have been kept entirely out of the loop, who is responsible for the seething anger among the people, the total mass disillusionment with the man they mistakenly elected 30 months ago. He has neither the wisdom nor the training to make revolutionary change nor the administrative acumen to effectively manage the transition. His one talent is speech-making - a characteristic shared by all demagogues from Mussolini to Modi - but while that has its uses as spectacle, it is no substitute for sound governance.”


When the Malignant Narcissist feels ‘injured’ by a deemed or real challenge, he reacts with disproportionate and uncontrollable rage, aggression and violence. Narcissists loathe virtually nothing more than being shamed or accused of something. Their already fragile self-esteem cannot handle the slightest criticism.

You can’t win a moral war with a Malignant Narc, they have None. You can’t hope to provoke their conscience, they have None. You can’t appeal to their humanity, they have none. You can’t hope to get them to like you—they only Like one person, that is themselves—all others are assets or liabilities.

The only way to deal with a Narc in your personal life is fairly simple—walk away or detach as much as possible.

In public life, try doing the same.

So, given that India has over two more years to cope with a “psychopath”, one simple advice I would give to AK would be to take many pages from Sun Tzu’s Art of War.

Sun Tzu was one the greatest military strategists in history and just one of the suggestions he made was, “Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt”. In other words, employ strategy and manipulation to counter manipulation, keep your plans close to your chest. 




By Neo Pachisia
@Neo_Pac
healwithneo@gmail.com


Disclaimer: I am Not a Clinical Psychologist or Psychiatrist. My ‘only’ knowledge of Narcissism is that I grew up with two (and survived) and have studied it for over a decade. Everything in this article is more or less my personal opinion, unless I have specifically quoted another. 



Bibliography



Confessions of Gujarat murderers: 




‘Gujarat Files’ author, publisher Rana Ayyub, 2016





To know more about Narcissism, Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Malignant or Healthy Narcissism


Otto Kernberg on Narcissism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyP92WLLqIU






An Open Letter to Mr Prashant Bhushan from Neo Pachisia



Dear Mr Bhushan,












Mr Bhushan I have absolutely no quarrel with you or others who split off from AAP. You may well have some valid reasons for being upset with Arvind Kejriwal (for brevity’s sake will refer to him as AK). My reason for writing is also not to defend AK, he can do that very well himself, but to explain to you why we support AK, AAP & it’s leaders and that I, like thousands of Aapians, love Arvind Kejriwal. 

In the interview you said, “But it was Kejriwal’s character that made everything go wrong. I didn’t quite realise that he was so unscrupulous, that he was willing to use any kinds of means to achieve his ends. Of course, political power can be useful, but it can’t be an end in itself, political power is only a means for doing something in public interest.”

In order to explain why we feel so passionate about this party I have to go into the backdrop of our experience of Indian politics and the governments in the last few decades.

For years, we have watched, with helpless incredulous rage as Congress ministers and their cronies have pillaged this country—all the scams, the corruption, going on unabated, year after year. The punishment to offenders, if any at all, was ridiculous. The slow and passive pace of development, the failure to provide even basic necessities to millions after 60 odd years of being in power.

Also MMS, undoubtedly a decent man and a brilliant economist was in my opinion a very poor leader, who as we know did nothing as PM to stop his party members from looting the exchequer and Indian tax payers.

So when it looked like Narendra Modi was coming to power so many of us felt hopeful for the first time in decades. We were blown away by his oratory, dazzled by his promises, his grasp of the pulse of people, how desperately starved we were of leadership, of a government that could shut down the scams and focus on development.

In fact, although I did some phone canvassing for Kumar Vishwas for Amethi elections, I didn’t for AK as I thought it was too huge a jump for him, for AAP and some part of me wanted Modi to win.

The day Modi was sworn-in, my mother-in-law blind but very clued into current affairs, asked “aloo na bhav ghati gaya che su?” Such was the expectation from a man who we now know has turned out to be a con-man extraordinaire!

Again, we watched and waited for a response from him when we heard remarks like “haraamzade” for Muslims from his party members, the absence of any true vikas, the jumlas, the outright unabashed admission of false promises and of course the millions being siphoned off in ways direct and indirect to Modi’s fund providers.

The scams if anything have gone worse and bigger, the hatred and communal divisiveness has metastasised like cancer , the attitude towards women, the saffronization—really I could go on and on about why I despise Modi and the BJP.

What blithering idiots he made of us and how absolutely he has disempowered us now. 

So given these conditions, so many of us are being instinctively drawn to AAP and AK as the answer to Modi and Congress. Not because AK is perfect as a leader and convener of AAP but because Arvind Kejriwal is a “good enough” leader. 

In psychology, there is a concept of “good enough mother” derived by psychologist D. W. Winnicott. Basically I see it as the idea that mothers & fathers can give up the need to be perfect parents, they just have to be good enough. Because when their children grow up they will find lacks in even the most beloved parent.

Human beings are flawed, Mr Bhushan and I believe “perfection is the enemy of getting done.” 

As you yourself have said, “Yes, he’s bold in taking on the Modi government and one must grant him that.”

I don’t just see AK as just bold Mr Bhushan, I see him as virtually fearless. This is the stuff heroes and saviours are made of. I think the reason for AK’s popularity is that he mirrors us, that we identify with him and we see in him qualities we so want to grow in us.

For instance, I suffer from chronic low grade anxiety, or fearfulness and so for me, AK’s fearlessness is a priceless quality and source of inspiration. The manner in which he confronts Modi, the most powerful man in India, AK encourages me to not be so timid in my own life.

We follow a political leader because we hope he will make our lives and living conditions better, who will at least lessen the corruption, who will focus as AAP does on specific areas—like health, education, water, electricity—Basic Fundamental rights of every person. (I’d really like AK to add women’s empowerment and Population control to that list, as critical areas).

You say AK is “unscrupulous”, I find that sometimes so am I and I bet so are you occasionally.

I feel ashamed when I have to bribe cops in Goa but I know it is not just expected but without it what I need from them (to do their duty), wouldn’t happen.

Yes right now I agree any partnership with Congress or BJP, more so BJP would be unacceptable but Mr Bhushan I also believe that political power is critical to effect any change! So who knows what I might do to have power, if I were in that position.

Each of us has an ethical line we won’t cross, certain values and principals we stand by but even I know that in politics this line has to be somewhat flexible. Not abandoned but elastic. 

AK is a bit or very autocratic you suggest. Maybe he is but I think success and achievement depend upon performance and most successful people like to be in control of factors that influence their performance. 

Besides, AK was seen as weak when he was practising a more consultative style of leadership.

The purpose of an idea or organisation can and must change and grow as necessary—so yes tackling corruption is critical for AAP but in the meanwhile providing potable water is also essential  part of a government’s duty.


You said, “Take the mohalla clinics – the agreement is that doctors will be paid Rs 30 for seeing a patient, so some useless doctors have been randomly picked up, those who just have an MBBS, and these doctors prepare a list of a large number of patients seen and not seen to get money, and the government has a list of patients to show. Then, for further medical investigations, the clinics have tied up with private companies where considerable amounts of money are being paid for blood tests, and typically, a lot of useless blood tests are being ordered that are not required. Then, a lot of contract labour are being employed in government hospitals, and other departments, where agencies are hired and given large commissions, and so on.”

In NHS (government) clinics in England, for most routine conditions these days we are actually seen by a nurse, or a senior nurse not even a “just have an MBBS doctor”.

So yes likely that some unscrupulous doctor is making a fake list of patients and sending them for unnecessary tests—but there are other doctors serving with dedication, patients being helped, patients now have an option they haven’t ever! So should the mohalla clinic be scrapped because some of them are not working the way they could or should.

When you say Congress would be a better government for Punjab, are you also not guilty of supporting a party you abhorred for it’s fostering of corruption—given that you were so disappointed with AK for wanting to form a government with them in 2014.

If AK is as dishonest as you think, he will unquestionably be exposed, just as Modi has been. 

But for now there are growing numbers of us who see in Arvind Kejriwal a leader and a man we can follow and emulate.

Mr Bhushan, since the time I started supporting AK and AAP and have been getting to know various other leaders of AAP, I’ve begun to feel less despair about governance in India. I feel they’ve given us something akin to hope, also a channel and a way to serve and make a contribution in any way we can.

Arvind Kejriwal may not be perfect, but is a “good enough” leader for me and for all those Aapians I am sure I speak for. 

Also given the state of siege that this sanghi-controlled government is trying to impose on the country, we need someone with the determination and fortitude of Arvind Kejriwal to stand up to it.

In the meanwhile, I truly hope you go ahead and create the party you envision. It’s a large, complicated country and all good people are welcome. 

Thank You for your time

Neo Pachisia
@Neo_Pac

“If in the darkness of ignorance, you don’t recognize a person’s true nature, look to see whom he has chosen for his leader.” Rumi




Posted 27th July 2016 by Neo Pachisia

19